Que carga de trabalhos, esta de seleccionar jornalistas nos dias de hoje. Exemplos:
1) Valoriza-se:
- Conhecimentos nas áreas de gestão pós-venda automóvel, gestão de frotas automóveis e gestão financeira;
- Carteira de contactos;
- Experiência em organização de eventos.
2) Produtora de televisão procura jornalista de tv.
Requisitos essenciais: [...]
- Disponibilidade mais do que imediata e total;
3) Empresa de comunicação gráfica, sedeada em Alfragide, procura jornalista para integrar a redacção das suas revistas especializadas. [...]
Requisitos:
- capacidade para escrever correctamente em português;
04 dezembro 2006
VITAMEDIAS
Extra: Newspapers Aren't Dead: Some predict their imminent demise, but the dailies remain profitable, popular and powerful. Here's why they'll survive
"Newspaper companies will become information companies. We'll do well because we have the best news resources and the most at stake."
Advertisers creating online buzz, blog to blog: The evolving corporate focus on "blog placement" is part of an intensifying trend, with elite bloggers receiving gifts like show tickets and bottles of Champagne.
"Newspaper companies will become information companies. We'll do well because we have the best news resources and the most at stake."
Advertisers creating online buzz, blog to blog: The evolving corporate focus on "blog placement" is part of an intensifying trend, with elite bloggers receiving gifts like show tickets and bottles of Champagne.
TECNOSFERA
Interessante análise sobre a evolução da espionagem e uso de software social: Open-Source Spying: For the intelligence agencies to benefit from "social software," he said, they need to persuade thousands of employees to begin blogging and creating wikis all at once. And that requires a cultural sea change: persuading analysts, who for years have survived by holding their cards tightly to their chests, to begin openly showing their hands online.
Is it possible to reconcile the needs of secrecy with such a radically open model for sharing? Certainly, there would be merit in a system that lets analysts quickly locate like-minded colleagues around the world to brainstorm new ideas about how the Iraqi insurgency will evolve. But the intelligence agencies also engage in covert operations that ferret out truly incendiary secrets: the locations of Iranian nuclear facilities, say, or the name of a Qaeda leader in Pakistan. Is this the sort of information that is safe to share widely in an online network?
Many in the intelligence agencies suspect not. Indeed, they often refuse to input sensitive intel into their own private, secure databases; they do not trust even their own colleagues, inside their own agencies, to keep their secrets safe. [...]
A spy blogosphere, even carefully secured against intruders, might be fundamentally incompatible with the goal of keeping secrets. And the converse is also true: blogs and wikis are unlikely to thrive in an environment where people are guarded about sharing information. Social software doesn?t work if people aren?t social.
Virtually all proponents of improved spy sharing are aware of this friction, and they have few answers. [...]
The premise of spy-blogging is that a million connected amateurs will always be smarter than a few experts collected in an elite star chamber; that Wikipedia will always move more quickly than the Encyclopaedia Britannica; that the country?s thousand-odd political bloggers will always spot news trends more quickly than slow-moving journalists in the mainstream media.
Is it possible to reconcile the needs of secrecy with such a radically open model for sharing? Certainly, there would be merit in a system that lets analysts quickly locate like-minded colleagues around the world to brainstorm new ideas about how the Iraqi insurgency will evolve. But the intelligence agencies also engage in covert operations that ferret out truly incendiary secrets: the locations of Iranian nuclear facilities, say, or the name of a Qaeda leader in Pakistan. Is this the sort of information that is safe to share widely in an online network?
Many in the intelligence agencies suspect not. Indeed, they often refuse to input sensitive intel into their own private, secure databases; they do not trust even their own colleagues, inside their own agencies, to keep their secrets safe. [...]
A spy blogosphere, even carefully secured against intruders, might be fundamentally incompatible with the goal of keeping secrets. And the converse is also true: blogs and wikis are unlikely to thrive in an environment where people are guarded about sharing information. Social software doesn?t work if people aren?t social.
Virtually all proponents of improved spy sharing are aware of this friction, and they have few answers. [...]
The premise of spy-blogging is that a million connected amateurs will always be smarter than a few experts collected in an elite star chamber; that Wikipedia will always move more quickly than the Encyclopaedia Britannica; that the country?s thousand-odd political bloggers will always spot news trends more quickly than slow-moving journalists in the mainstream media.
VITAMEDIAS
A Newspaper Chain Sees Its Future, And It's Online and Hyper-Local: The mojos [mobile journalists] have high-tech tools -- ThinkPads, digital audio recorders, digital still and video cameras -- but no desk, no chair, no nameplate, no land line, no office. They spend their time on the road looking for stories, filing several a day for the newspaper's Web site, and often for the print edition, too. Their guiding principle: A constantly updated stream of intensely local, fresh Web content -- regardless of its traditional news value -- is key to building online and newspaper readership. [...]
The chain's papers are redirecting their newsrooms to focus on the Web first, paper second. Papers are slashing national and foreign coverage and beefing up "hyper-local," street-by-street news. They are creating reader-searchable databases on traffic flows and school class sizes. Web sites are fed with reader-generated content, such as pictures of their kids with Santa. In short, Gannett -- at its 90 papers, including USA Today -- is trying everything it can think of to create Web sites that will attract more readers.
The chain's papers are redirecting their newsrooms to focus on the Web first, paper second. Papers are slashing national and foreign coverage and beefing up "hyper-local," street-by-street news. They are creating reader-searchable databases on traffic flows and school class sizes. Web sites are fed with reader-generated content, such as pictures of their kids with Santa. In short, Gannett -- at its 90 papers, including USA Today -- is trying everything it can think of to create Web sites that will attract more readers.
02 dezembro 2006
ECOPOL
Pronto tábem: Iraq invasion was good for Portugal says Barroso: Former Portuguese Prime Minister and current President of the European Commission has said he holds no regrets over Portugals support for the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Duro Barroso, steadfast that his decision was correct to support George W. Bush, admitted that the allied forces military action in Iraq is not going as planned.
TECNOSFERA
The Imminent Demise of the Page View: As the page view platform crumbles, there's going to be a shake out. Everyone is going to scramble to find a metric that helps them compete for ad dollars. Enjoy the show.
CULTURAS IN VITRO
40 best directors: The Hollywood blockbuster may be in crisis, but the art of the cinema is as healthy as ever. Our panel of critics picks out the film-makers who are leading the way
01 dezembro 2006
CULTURAS IN VITRO
Back to the Future timeline [This article is being considered for deletion]
"An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility": This short study examines Wikipedia?s credibility by asking 258 research staff with a response rate of 21 percent, to read an article and assess its credibility, the credibility of its author and the credibility of Wikipedia as a whole. Staff were either given an article in their own expert domain or a random article. No difference was found between the two group in terms of their perceived credibility of Wikipedia or of the articles? authors, but a difference was found in the credibility of the articles ? the experts found Wikipedia?s articles to be more credible than the non?experts. This suggests that the accuracy of Wikipedia is high. However, the results should not be seen as support for Wikipedia as a totally reliable resource as, according to the experts, 13 percent of the articles contain mistakes.
"An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility": This short study examines Wikipedia?s credibility by asking 258 research staff with a response rate of 21 percent, to read an article and assess its credibility, the credibility of its author and the credibility of Wikipedia as a whole. Staff were either given an article in their own expert domain or a random article. No difference was found between the two group in terms of their perceived credibility of Wikipedia or of the articles? authors, but a difference was found in the credibility of the articles ? the experts found Wikipedia?s articles to be more credible than the non?experts. This suggests that the accuracy of Wikipedia is high. However, the results should not be seen as support for Wikipedia as a totally reliable resource as, according to the experts, 13 percent of the articles contain mistakes.
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)